Maulana Maududi and Tehreek-e-Pakistan


Tahreek e pakistan

 Many false allegations have been leveled against Jamaat-e-Islami and Maulana Maududi regarding the Tehreek-e-Pakistan. Is. Sadly, Maulana Maudoodi and the accusers of Jamaat-e-Islami do not present any argument or evidence in support of their allegations, they just want what they say to be accepted. In any case, we benefit from their words because under this pretext we get the opportunity to convey our message to you. We will try to get the Tehreek-e-Pakistan, Allama Iqbal, Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah and the Islamic system in Pakistan. Tell people about the struggle of Jamaat-e-Islami and Maulana Maududi for implementation.

First of all, we will talk that Maulana Maududi is accused of calling Quaid-e-Azam a Kafir-e-Azam. Those who say this have not been able to present any evidence to support their point. Because when one thing has not happened, how can there be evidence about it? The fact is that people know very little and even those who do know, they deliberately hide the truth. Maulana Maudavi or any leader of the party has never called Quaid-e-Azam a Kafir-e-Azam. One of the famous Ahrari leaders of the time was Mazhar Ali Azhar who had said this nonsense in a public meeting in Lahore and this meeting was presided over by Ghulam Ghaus Hazarawi. The incident can be mentioned in the Munir Inquiry Report.

Maulana Maududi and the Two National Ideology:

In 1937, the political movement of the Congress gained so much momentum that a large number of Muslim scholars themselves joined the Hindus. The Congress used to say that the Muslims of India and the Hindus were all one nation. It was dangerous that if this was accepted, the separate status of Muslims in India would be completely lost and their religion would also be endangered. This ideology of the Congress was called "United Nation" or "One National Ideology". Sensing the seriousness of this threat, Maududi wrote a number of articles against it, which were published in the form of books, entitled "The Issue of Nationality" and "Muslims and the Current Political Conflict", Part I and II. In these articles, Syed Maududi proved with strong arguments that Muslims and Hindus are two separate nations. Because their concept of God, religious beliefs, way of life and way of life are all different, it is absolutely wrong to call them one nation. 

After the Pakistan resolution, the great leaders of the Muslims and other leaders of the Muslim League started saying the same thing. This is called the "two nation ideology". Syed Maududi hashed out the idea of ​​separate nationality of Muslims in such a good and excellent way that with this virtue no one else could reasonably advocate the separate national concept of Muslims. Syed Maududi gave arguments from Qur'an and Hadith. Thus, Syed Maududi was the first person to present the ideology of Pakistan on a scientific level with strong arguments and to provide strong rational and Islamic arguments for a two-nation ideology in favor of Pakistan. Even the scholars affiliated with the Congress had no answer to these arguments. 

After that, the idea of ​​Pakistan became strong among the Muslims and the Muslim League's campaign for a separate Islamic and national homeland was greatly strengthened by these arguments of Syed Maududi. Now these articles have been published under the name of “Tehreek-e-Azadi-e-Hind and Muslims” Part I and II. Pages 53-54)

Maulana Maududi himself says of his essays: "In 1937, I agreed to go from Hyderabad to Delhi. During this trip, I realized that after the formation of the Congress government in the six provinces of India. There were signs of open defeat for the Muslims. On my way back to Hyderabad from Delhi, a well-known Hindu leader on the train, 

Dr. Khare (Dr. Khare was elected Chief Minister of the CP after the 1937 elections) happened to be in the same compartment. I was traveling in which I was and there were many Muslims in it. I saw Muslim talking to Dr. Khare in the same way as the people of a subjugated nation do to the person of the ruling nation. This scene is unbearable for me. When I reached Hyderabad, I was convinced that my night's sleep was gone and I kept thinking, O Allah! Now what will happen to the Muslims in this land. Finally, I wrote a series of articles which was published under the name of "Muslims and the current political conflict" in the first part. (29 years of Jamaat-e-Islami page 17 edition September 2009)

Maulana Maududi and the Partition of India:

Today, in the name of hope for peace, tolerance, etc., attempts are being made to disprove the partition of India. If a person speaks against it, he is accused of extremism and intolerance. There is negative propaganda about the people who guided the Muslims during the establishment of Pakistan. It is also worth mentioning here that Jamaat-e-Islami and Maulana Mudavi are accused of opposing Pakistan. Those who say so do not know why they forget the speech of Muttahida Quaid Altaf Hussain during his visit to India (in which he explicitly called the partition of India a great mistake in human history). It is not known why people ignore the statement of Zulfiqar Mirza, the current Home Minister of Sindh and a key leader of the PPP, that "after the assassination of Bibi, we had planned to break Pakistan" as if these people According to him, Pakistan's existence is useful only for its own interests, otherwise there is no need for it. All such people ignore the ANP's past when Abdul Ghaffar Khan was called "Sarhadi Gandhi" for his anti-Pakistan views.

Put all these things in front of you and then put the character of the late Maulana Maudavi in ​​front of you. ”When a group of Muslims asked how the partition of India and its disintegration could be witnessed, Maulana Maudoodi Sahib "As a Muslim, in my view, the question of whether India should remain one country or be divided into ten parts is irrelevant. The whole earth is one country. Man has divided it into thousands of parts," he said. If the division so far was permissible, then what will happen if there is further division in the future? 

Those who consider it a god will suffer when this idol breaks down. I would like to find an area of ​​one square mile in which God Without anyone's sovereignty, I would consider a speck of it more valuable than all of India. (Political Conflict Part III pp. 76-77)

Siilarly, on the occasion of the referendum in NWFP in 1948, Maulana Maududi, in response to a question, said, "The referendum is only about which country do you want to be associated with, India or Pakistan?" It is absolutely permissible to give an opinion in this matter and there is no Shariah obscenity in it. Therefore, the members of Jamaat-e-Islami in the areas where the referendum is being held are allowed to give their opinion in it. I can say that if I had been a resident of NWFP, my vote in the referendum would have been in favor of Pakistan. (The three-day Kausar dated July 5, 1947, with reference to the Indian Independence Movement and Muslims Part II, page 88)

After all this, the question arises as to why negative propaganda is being spread about Jamaat-e-Islami with reference to Tehreek-e-Pakistan. So the answer is quite clear that after the establishment of Pakistan, when the Jamaat-e-Islami demanded the implementation of the Islamic system, only after that negative propaganda about the Jamaat-e-Islami was started. Participation in the meeting is a matter of concern for those interested in Tehreek-e-Pakistan and the history of Pakistan. Prior to this, from 1937 to 1939, Maulana started a long series of articles which were published in book form under the name of Muslims and the current political conflict. 

These articles were published in the supporting leaflets of the Muslim League such as "Monthly Payam-e-Haq", Pathankot, "Al-Qasim, Amritsar", "Mushur", Delhi, "Tolo-e-Islam", Delhi and distributed among the League workers free of cost. From 1937 to 1947, hundreds of front-line leaders of the Muslim League were buyers of these pamphlets, but it never crossed anyone's mind that Maulana Mudavi and his party were opposing the Tehreek-e-Pakistan. After hearing this, the Liaquat government has revealed that Maulana and his party were against Pakistan. No evidence, no investigation, no witnesses, only false statements and false oaths to warm up the meetings ”(Great Leaders of the World Islamic Movement by Iftikhar Ahmad, pp. 49-50)

Even today, anti-religious and anti-national elements who do not want the Islamic system to be implemented in this country in any way, those who cannot change themselves because they want to change Islam, those who fulfill the message of Allah (Islam) They want Islam to be proven to be a useless religion. Islamists should be declared extremists and enemies of the country and traitors